Close Menu
  • Home
  • News Update
  • Legal Updates
  • Free Legal Resources
  • Law News
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions

Subscribe to receive Updates

Get the latest updates from us

What's Hot

Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

May 1, 2026

PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

May 1, 2026

Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

May 1, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Lawbreed Blog
Visit our Website
  • Home
  • News Update

    Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

    May 1, 2026

    PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

    May 1, 2026

    Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

    May 1, 2026

    Court Orders Accelerated Trial in Alleged Coup Plot Case, Military Tribunal to Resume in May

    April 29, 2026

    FG Slams 13-Count Charge on Alleged Coup Plotters

    April 21, 2026
  • Legal Updates

    Case Law Friday: Substantial Justice Over Technicalities – A Supreme Court Insight from FRN v. Odeh (2025) 4–5 S.C. (Pt. I) 1 @ 35–38

    April 17, 2026

    Recalibrating Physical Planning In Nigeria

    September 19, 2025

    How to Process a Change of Name at the Supreme Court : Updated Requirements

    May 8, 2025

    What residents should know and do about Wike’s land policy to protect properties

    April 15, 2025

    EXPLAINER: What constitution says about emergency rule, governor’s suspension

    March 19, 2025
  • Free Legal Resources

    [Download Judgment] Court convicts Nnamdi Kanu on all seven terrorism counts in Abuja

    November 20, 2025

    US court orders FBI, DEA to release records on Tinubu’s investigation (See UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION)

    April 14, 2025

    Relief for Tinubu as U.S. judge denies Greenspan’s motion to fast-track confidential records disclosure by FBI, CIA, others

    October 24, 2023

    Nigeria wins $11bn P&ID case in UK court (Download Judgment)

    October 23, 2023

    Download: 12-hour marathon judgement delivered by the Presidential Election Petitions Court

    September 9, 2023
  • Law News

    “Not Qualified for Admission” — Appeal Court Backs Cancellation of Orji Kalu’s Degree

    April 28, 2026

    Court restrains firm directors from selling assets

    April 28, 2026

    Court Restrains Police, FRSC from Enforcing Third-Party Insurance Fines on Motorists

    April 24, 2026

    Court Remands Alleged Coup Plotters in DSS Custody

    April 22, 2026

    ‘I’m a UNN Law Graduate but Didn’t Attend Law School’ — EFCC Probes Suspected Fake Lawyer

    April 22, 2026
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Lawbreed Blog
Home»News Update»US Supreme Court halts COVID-19 vaccine rule for businesses
News Update

US Supreme Court halts COVID-19 vaccine rule for businesses

Lawbreed LimitedBy Lawbreed LimitedJanuary 14, 2022No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
US SUPREME COURT
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email WhatsApp

The US Supreme Court has stopped a major push by the Biden administration to boost the nation’s COVID-19 vaccination rate, a requirement that employees at large businesses get a vaccine or test regularly and wear a mask on the job.

At the same time, the court is allowing the administration to proceed with a vaccine mandate for most health care workers in the U.S. The court’s orders Thursday came during a spike in coronavirus cases caused by the omicron variant.

The court’s conservative majority concluded the administration overstepped its authority by seeking to impose the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine-or-test rule on U.S. businesses with at least 100 employees. More than 80 million people would have been affected and OSHA had estimated that the rule would save 6,500 lives and prevent 250,000 hospitalizations over six months.

“OSHA has never before imposed such a mandate. Nor has Congress. Indeed, although Congress has enacted significant legislation addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, it has declined to enact any measure similar to what OSHA has promulgated here,” the conservatives wrote in an unsigned opinion.

In dissent, the court’s three liberals argued that it was the court that was overreaching by substituting its judgment for that of health experts. “Acting outside of its competence and without legal basis, the Court displaces the judgments of the Government officials given the responsibility to respond to workplace health emergencies,” Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a joint dissent.

President Joe Biden said he was “disappointed that the Supreme Court has chosen to block common-sense life-saving requirements for employees at large businesses that were grounded squarely in both science and the law.”

Biden called on businesses to institute their own vaccination requirements, noting that a third of Fortune 100 companies already have done so.

When crafting the OSHA rule, White House officials always anticipated legal challenges — and privately some harboured doubts that it could withstand them. The administration nonetheless still views the rule as a success at already driving millions of people to get vaccinated and encouraging private businesses to implement their own requirements that are unaffected by the legal challenge.

The OSHA regulation had initially been blocked by a federal appeals court in New Orleans, then allowed to take effect by a federal appellate panel in Cincinnati.

Both rules had been challenged by Republican-led states. In addition, business groups attacked the OSHA emergency regulation as too expensive and likely to cause workers to leave their jobs at a time when finding new employees already is difficult.

The National Retail Federation, the nation’s largest retail trade group, called the Supreme Court’s decision “a significant victory for employers.”

The vaccine mandate that the court will allow to be enforced nationwide scraped by on a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joining the liberals to form a majority. The mandate covers virtually all health care workers in the country, applying to providers that receive federal Medicare or Medicaid funding. It affects 10.4 million workers at 76,000 health care facilities as well as home health care providers. The rule has medical and religious exemptions.

Biden said that decision by the court “will save lives.”

In an unsigned opinion, the court wrote: “The challenges posed by a global pandemic do not allow a federal agency to exercise power that Congress has not conferred upon it. At the same time, such unprecedented circumstances provide no grounds for limiting the exercise of authorities the agency has long been recognized to have.” It said the “latter principle governs” in the healthcare arena.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in dissent that the case was about whether the administration has the authority “to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo.” He said the administration hadn’t shown convincingly that Congress gave it that authority.

Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett signed onto Thomas’ opinion. Alito wrote a separate dissent that the other three conservatives also joined.

Decisions by federal appeals courts in New Orleans and St. Louis had blocked the mandate in about half the states. The administration already was taking steps to enforce it elsewhere.

More than 208 million Americans, 62.7% of the population, are fully vaccinated, and more than a third of those have received booster shots, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. All nine justices have gotten booster shots.

The courthouse remains closed to the public, and lawyers and reporters are asked for negative test results before being allowed inside the courtroom for arguments, though vaccinations are not required.

The justices heard arguments on the challenges last week. Their questions then hinted at the split verdict that they issued Thursday.

A separate vaccine mandate for federal contractors, on hold after lower courts blocked it, has not been considered by the Supreme Court.

[Associated Press]

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Lawbreed Limited
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Related Posts

Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

May 1, 2026

PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

May 1, 2026

Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

May 1, 2026

Comments are closed.

DARK HEARTS by Layi Babatunde, SAN – CLICK TO BUY
Top Posts

Trump, Sons, and Trump Organization File $10bn Lawsuit Against IRS and Treasury Over Tax Data Breach

January 30, 2026580 Views

$2bn debt dispute: Court rejects Olanipekun, Banire’s appointments as counsels to Nestoil, Neconde

January 23, 2026554 Views

UK introduces eVisas for Nigerian study, work visa applicants

July 9, 2025551 Views

Federal High Court Declares Lower Courts Lack Powers to Freeze Bank Accounts

January 16, 2026445 Views
QUALITY BOOKS & LAW REPORTS BREEDS QUALITY PRACTICE
https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Law-Breed_x264.mp4
Don't Miss

Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

News Update May 1, 2026

The Supreme Court has set aside the order for status quo ante bellum made by…

PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

May 1, 2026

Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

May 1, 2026

Court Orders Accelerated Trial in Alleged Coup Plot Case, Military Tribunal to Resume in May

April 29, 2026

“Not Qualified for Admission” — Appeal Court Backs Cancellation of Orji Kalu’s Degree

April 28, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram

Subscribe to get Updates

Get the latest creative news delivered to your email. subscribe now

Supreme Court Report Online (My S.C Extra)
Our Picks

Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

May 1, 2026

PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

May 1, 2026

Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

May 1, 2026

Court Orders Accelerated Trial in Alleged Coup Plot Case, Military Tribunal to Resume in May

April 29, 2026
Don't Miss

Supreme Court reaffirms David Mark as ADC Chairman

News Update May 1, 2026

The Supreme Court has set aside the order for status quo ante bellum made by…

PDP Ibadan convention illegal, Supreme Court rules

May 1, 2026

Court Backs FCCPC Oversight of Healthcare Consumer Complaints

May 1, 2026

Court Orders Accelerated Trial in Alleged Coup Plot Case, Military Tribunal to Resume in May

April 29, 2026
About Us
About Us

Lawbreed Blog is owned by Lawbreed Limited, a full fledged Law publishing and marketing Private Limited Liability Company, incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Email Us: mails@lawbreed.com
Contact: +2348077011730

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Tags
#2023Election Adeleke AGF AI AMCON APC Atiku Bamise Bandits Bill BOSAN Bribe BRT Buhari CBN CJN Covid EFCC FEA feature featured FG FHC FIRS Fraud INEC Lawbreed LAYI BABATUNDE SAN metro Multichoice NBA NICN NJC Nnamdi Kanu NPC Obi Osun State Popular SAN Supreme Court Tax Tinubu Trending Twitter VAT
Most Popular

Trump, Sons, and Trump Organization File $10bn Lawsuit Against IRS and Treasury Over Tax Data Breach

January 30, 2026580 Views

$2bn debt dispute: Court rejects Olanipekun, Banire’s appointments as counsels to Nestoil, Neconde

January 23, 2026554 Views

UK introduces eVisas for Nigerian study, work visa applicants

July 9, 2025551 Views

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.