Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
  • Home
  • News Update
  • Legal Updates
  • Free Legal Resources
  • Law News
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
  • Home
  • News Update

    CJN didn’t meet Tinubu in London, allegation false — Supreme Court

    March 24, 2023

    Buhari Signs Bill Mandating Tinubu To Appoint Cabinet In 60 Days

    March 18, 2023

    Peju Ugboma: FCCPC applauds coroner’s inquest

    March 10, 2023

    Alleged Racism: FG Revokes Seplat CEO, Brown’s Visa, Residence, Work Permits

    March 10, 2023

    CBN issues operational guidelines on open banking

    March 9, 2023
  • Legal Updates

    The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society

    March 13, 2023

    Abia Assembly Passes Bill Allowing Female Children Share in Parent’s Inheritance

    November 25, 2022

    Industrial court issues new Practice Directions on labour matters

    October 6, 2022

    Step By Step Guide on how to register a ship in Nigeria

    September 8, 2022

    Buhari Swears In Ariwoola As Acting Chief Justice Of Nigeria

    June 27, 2022
  • Free Legal Resources

    Tax Appeal Tribunal says certain costs and employee remuneration are not deductible

    February 10, 2023

    [DOWNLOAD]: Judgement Of Osun State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal Sacking Adeleke As Governor

    January 28, 2023

    DOWNLOAD: Supreme Court of Kenya Presidential Election Petition Judgment

    September 6, 2022

    Ross McKenzie Kirkpatrick v. The Queen (Download Judgment)

    August 3, 2022

    [DOWNLOAD JUDGMENT] PDP v. INEC, APC, Umahi & Kelechi Igwe

    March 11, 2022
  • Law News

    The complete list of judges nominated for the 2023 election petition Tribunals 

    March 28, 2023

    Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) Bows Out As The Chairman Of The Body Of Bencher 30 March 2023

    March 28, 2023

    10 years or life sentence? What the law says about Ekweremadu’s organ trafficking conviction

    March 24, 2023

    Appeal court affirms Adeleke as Osun governor

    March 24, 2023

    Hoodlums set court ablaze in Ebonyi

    March 22, 2023
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
Lawbreed Blog » Supreme Court of Nigeria on punishment for Blasphemy in Islam: See – SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107
Legal Updates

Supreme Court of Nigeria on punishment for Blasphemy in Islam: See – SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

Lawbreed LimitedBy Lawbreed LimitedMay 16, 2022Updated:May 16, 2022No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

CASE CITATION: ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

DATE OF JUDGMENT: FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007
COURT: SUPREME COURT
SUIT: SC.  245/2004

CORAM:

  1. SYLVESTER U ONU, JSC – (Presided)
  2. OGUNTADE, JSC (Delivered the Leading Judgment)
  3. MUKHTAR, JSC
  4. WALTER S. N. ONNOGHEN, JSC
  5. BRAHIM T. MUHAMMAD, JSC

ISSUE(S): Duty  on trial  court  to consider all the defences open to an accused -guiding principles on discharge of duty thereby -when the defences of justification and provocation may be considered by the trial court

CASE SYNTHESIS

Facts: The appellant and the 5 accused persons charged along with him had heard from some sources that the deceased had some wherein their village made some remarks which were considered insulting to Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.). The text  of the remarks or the exact words employed by the deceased were not given in evidence. The 1st accused had read to the other accused persons including the appellant  a passage in the Holy  Quran where it  was said to be prescribed  that any one who insulted Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.)in the manner the deceased was said to have done deserved to be killed. As adherents to the teaching in the Holy Quran, the appellant and the other accused persons accepted that they had a duty to kill the deceased in effectuating the contents of the Holy Quran. They accordingly slaughtered the deceased by slicing his throat. The appellant, Abubakar  Dan Shalla, was the fifth of six accused persons who were brought  before the High Court  of Kebbi State, Birnin  Kebbi  on  a three-count  charge of  criminal  conspiracy, abatement and culpable homicide contrary to Sections 97, 85 and221(a) of the Penal Code respectively. On 18/1/2000, each of the appellant and the five other accused persons charged with him pleaded not guilty to each of the three counts . Hearing of the case opened on 19/1/2000.

The prosecution called eight witnesses. The appellant elected not to testify or call a witness. Thetrial Judge, Ambursa, J., on 24-02-2000, in his judgment found the appellant and the five other accused persons charged with him guilty of the offence of culpable homicide and each was sentenced to death under  Section 221(a) of the Penal Code. The appellant brought an appeal against the judgment of the trial court before the Court of Appeal, Kaduna (hereinafter referred to as ‘the court below’)

The court below, on 10-12-03, in its judgment dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The appellant has come before the Supreme Court on a final appeal. The appellant raised three grounds of appeal out of which two issues were formulated for determination. The said issues are:

  1. Whether the learned Justices of the Court  of A ppeal  ought  to confirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant by the trial court. (This issue is distilled from grounds 1  and 2  of the grounds of appeal).
  2. Whether the learned Justices of the Court  of Appeal were right in raising the issues of defences of justification and provocation without affording the parties the right to be heard on the said issue raised suo motu.  (This issue is distilled from ground 3 of the grounds of appeal).”

OGUNTADE, JSC – I have given a very careful consideration to the two issues raised by the appellant in this appeal. Both must be decided against the appellant. The evidence against the appellant by prosecution witnesses was neither challenged nor contradicted. More than that is the admission in Exhibits G and G1 by the appellant that he actually slit the throat of the deceased. In any case, even on the assumption (although without any proof) that the deceased had in some way done any thing or uttered any  word  which  was  considered  insulting  to  the  Holy  Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.), was it open to the appellant and others with him to constitute themselves into a court of law and pronounce the  death  sentence  on  another  citizen?  Plainly,  this  was  jungle justice at its most primitive and callous level. The facts of this case are rather chilling and leave one wondering why the appellant and the others with him committed this most barbaric act. It cannot escape notice  that  the  victim  of  this  reckless  and  irresponsible behaviour is another Moslem, an Alhaji. I am greatly pained by the occurrence. In the final conclusion, this appeal fails. It is dismissed. I affirm the judgment of the two courts below.

SYLVESTER U ONU, JSC  – It is clear that for the defence of provocation to avail the appellant, the act or utterance of the deceased must  be  directly  offered  or  directed  against  the appellant, which was not the case here where it was based on hearsay or rumour. There is no direct or indirect evidence to show that the appellant  was provoked  by the deceased  vide Exhibits G and G1 (the latter being the Hausa and the English translation of the appellant’s statement at pages18-20 thereof, as well as the evidence of P.W.5 at page51 of the record) which is enough to convict the appellant as charged. Consequently,  it  is  manifest  that  the  lone  issue before  the  lower  court  is  clear  and  related  to  all  the  defences.

MUHAMMAD, JSC – I cannot see how these kind of people shall have any respite by the law. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Life is precious to all and sundry. He who kills by the sword shall die by the sword. I have no sympathy of the banishment of such busy bodies who respect no human life due to their high degree of misapprehension of the law or, should I say, complete ignorance of the  law.  The appellant  failed  to  convince  me  through  his explanations. But he is free to make further and better explanations to the hang man, though belatedly it may be. I find no merit in this appeal. I dismiss same. I affirm the conviction and sentence of the trial court which were affirmed by the court below.

Held: (Unanimously dismissing the appeal):

That there is no evidence on the record to support the plea of neither justification nor provocation.  Indeed, the appellant did not lead any  evidence in  his own  defence.  The appellant merely acted on a rumour to carry out an illegal act of slaughtering a human being under the misguided belief that he and the others had a duty under Islamic injunction to kill the deceased for illegally insulting Prophet Mohammad  (S.A.W).  The alleged provocative words said to have been uttered by the deceased was never placed before the trial court; and the court will not speculate on that. Appeal dismissed

ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

[mks_button size=”medium” title=”Click Here To Read The Full Decision of the Supreme Court” style=”squared” url=”https://www.lawbreed.com/site/search-for-case/?case_ref=895″ target=”_self” bg_color=”#000000″ txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=”” nofollow=”0″]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Related

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Lawbreed Limited
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Related Posts

The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society

March 13, 2023

Abia Assembly Passes Bill Allowing Female Children Share in Parent’s Inheritance

November 25, 2022

Industrial court issues new Practice Directions on labour matters

October 6, 2022

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Like Our Page
Lawbreed Limited
DARK HEARTS by Layi Babatunde, SAN – CLICK TO BUY
DARK HEART BY LAYI BABATUNDE, SAN
Top Posts

Finance Act, 2019 – Discover The Plus And Minus Of It – Click To Download

March 4, 2020

Holding Property Jointly – By Layi Babatunde, Esq

March 4, 2020

Is Your Deed Truly Delivered? – By Layi Babatunde, Esq.

March 4, 2020

It Is Unprofessional Conduct For Counsel To Walk Out On Or From The Court

March 4, 2020
QUALITY BOOKS & LAW REPORTS BREEDS QUALITY PRACTICE
https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Law-Breed_x264.mp4
Don't Miss
General Update

US Justice Dept recovers $53m laundered oil money from Aluko, Omokore

By Lawbreed LimitedMarch 29, 2023

The United States(US) Justice Department on Monday March 27, 2023 announced the final resolution of…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

The complete list of judges nominated for the 2023 election petition Tribunals 

March 28, 2023

Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) Bows Out As The Chairman Of The Body Of Bencher 30 March 2023

March 28, 2023

CJN didn’t meet Tinubu in London, allegation false — Supreme Court

March 24, 2023

10 years or life sentence? What the law says about Ekweremadu’s organ trafficking conviction

March 24, 2023
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Supreme Court Report Online (My S.C Extra)
s.c online
About Us
About Us

Lawbreed Blog is owned by Lawbreed Limited, a full fledged Law publishing and marketing Private Limited Liability Company, incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Email Us: mails@lawbreed.com
Contact: +2348077011730

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Tags
2023 Election Ajetunmobi AMCON APC Bandits Bill bolt Buhari BVAS CBN Coronar Covid crime feat featured FIDA FIRS Fraud ICPC INEC Instagram kano Labour Party Momo Bank Multichoice NBA New Naira Notes NICArb NICN NJC NUC o Old Naira Notes oransaye Owo massacre PEBEC practice directions pwc SAN Shar'iah Sylvester Tax Twitter VAT voluntary association
Most Popular

Finance Act, 2019 – Discover The Plus And Minus Of It – Click To Download

March 4, 2020

Holding Property Jointly – By Layi Babatunde, Esq

March 4, 2020

Is Your Deed Truly Delivered? – By Layi Babatunde, Esq.

March 4, 2020
© 2023 Lawbreed.blog. Powered by Lawbreed Ltd.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • S.C Report Online
  • Our Publications
  • Lawyers Directory

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.