Close Menu
  • Home
  • News Update
  • Legal Updates
  • Free Legal Resources
  • Law News
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions

Subscribe to receive Updates

Get the latest updates from us

What's Hot

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

June 14, 2025

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Lawbreed Blog
Visit our Website
  • Home
  • News Update

    Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

    June 14, 2025

    ‘Omo-onile’ now in trouble, risk 21yrs imprisonment in Ondo —Aiyedatiwa goes tough on land issues

    May 29, 2025

    ICPC secures conviction of Lagos civil servant for receiving double salaries

    May 29, 2025

    Naira abuse: Kano Tiktoker, Murja, sentenced to 6 months in jail

    May 29, 2025

    FCT High Court Slams EFCC For Breach of Applicant’s Fundamental Rights, Awards N2m Costs

    May 26, 2025
  • Legal Updates

    How to Process a Change of Name at the Supreme Court : Updated Requirements

    May 8, 2025

    What residents should know and do about Wike’s land policy to protect properties

    April 15, 2025

    EXPLAINER: What constitution says about emergency rule, governor’s suspension

    March 19, 2025

    The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society

    March 13, 2023

    Abia Assembly Passes Bill Allowing Female Children Share in Parent’s Inheritance

    November 25, 2022
  • Free Legal Resources

    US court orders FBI, DEA to release records on Tinubu’s investigation (See UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION)

    April 14, 2025

    Relief for Tinubu as U.S. judge denies Greenspan’s motion to fast-track confidential records disclosure by FBI, CIA, others

    October 24, 2023

    Nigeria wins $11bn P&ID case in UK court (Download Judgment)

    October 23, 2023

    Download: 12-hour marathon judgement delivered by the Presidential Election Petitions Court

    September 9, 2023

    (Download Judgment) It’s Unconstitutional, Unlawful For Minister To Deduct From Or Tamper With Financial Allocations To States — FHC Rules

    June 27, 2023
  • Law News

    Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

    June 14, 2025

    Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

    June 7, 2025

    Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

    June 7, 2025

    Lawyers sue senators to refund salaries over poor performance

    May 29, 2025

    Kogi CJ signs new area Court rules

    May 26, 2025
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Lawbreed Blog
Home»Legal Updates»Supreme Court of Nigeria on punishment for Blasphemy in Islam: See – SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107
Legal Updates

Supreme Court of Nigeria on punishment for Blasphemy in Islam: See – SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

Lawbreed LimitedBy Lawbreed LimitedMay 16, 2022Updated:May 16, 2022No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

CASE CITATION: ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

DATE OF JUDGMENT: FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007
COURT: SUPREME COURT
SUIT: SC.  245/2004

CORAM:

  1. SYLVESTER U ONU, JSC – (Presided)
  2. OGUNTADE, JSC (Delivered the Leading Judgment)
  3. MUKHTAR, JSC
  4. WALTER S. N. ONNOGHEN, JSC
  5. BRAHIM T. MUHAMMAD, JSC

ISSUE(S): Duty  on trial  court  to consider all the defences open to an accused -guiding principles on discharge of duty thereby -when the defences of justification and provocation may be considered by the trial court

CASE SYNTHESIS

Facts: The appellant and the 5 accused persons charged along with him had heard from some sources that the deceased had some wherein their village made some remarks which were considered insulting to Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.). The text  of the remarks or the exact words employed by the deceased were not given in evidence. The 1st accused had read to the other accused persons including the appellant  a passage in the Holy  Quran where it  was said to be prescribed  that any one who insulted Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.)in the manner the deceased was said to have done deserved to be killed. As adherents to the teaching in the Holy Quran, the appellant and the other accused persons accepted that they had a duty to kill the deceased in effectuating the contents of the Holy Quran. They accordingly slaughtered the deceased by slicing his throat. The appellant, Abubakar  Dan Shalla, was the fifth of six accused persons who were brought  before the High Court  of Kebbi State, Birnin  Kebbi  on  a three-count  charge of  criminal  conspiracy, abatement and culpable homicide contrary to Sections 97, 85 and221(a) of the Penal Code respectively. On 18/1/2000, each of the appellant and the five other accused persons charged with him pleaded not guilty to each of the three counts . Hearing of the case opened on 19/1/2000.

The prosecution called eight witnesses. The appellant elected not to testify or call a witness. Thetrial Judge, Ambursa, J., on 24-02-2000, in his judgment found the appellant and the five other accused persons charged with him guilty of the offence of culpable homicide and each was sentenced to death under  Section 221(a) of the Penal Code. The appellant brought an appeal against the judgment of the trial court before the Court of Appeal, Kaduna (hereinafter referred to as ‘the court below’)

The court below, on 10-12-03, in its judgment dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The appellant has come before the Supreme Court on a final appeal. The appellant raised three grounds of appeal out of which two issues were formulated for determination. The said issues are:

  1. Whether the learned Justices of the Court  of A ppeal  ought  to confirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant by the trial court. (This issue is distilled from grounds 1  and 2  of the grounds of appeal).
  2. Whether the learned Justices of the Court  of Appeal were right in raising the issues of defences of justification and provocation without affording the parties the right to be heard on the said issue raised suo motu.  (This issue is distilled from ground 3 of the grounds of appeal).”

OGUNTADE, JSC – I have given a very careful consideration to the two issues raised by the appellant in this appeal. Both must be decided against the appellant. The evidence against the appellant by prosecution witnesses was neither challenged nor contradicted. More than that is the admission in Exhibits G and G1 by the appellant that he actually slit the throat of the deceased. In any case, even on the assumption (although without any proof) that the deceased had in some way done any thing or uttered any  word  which  was  considered  insulting  to  the  Holy  Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.), was it open to the appellant and others with him to constitute themselves into a court of law and pronounce the  death  sentence  on  another  citizen?  Plainly,  this  was  jungle justice at its most primitive and callous level. The facts of this case are rather chilling and leave one wondering why the appellant and the others with him committed this most barbaric act. It cannot escape notice  that  the  victim  of  this  reckless  and  irresponsible behaviour is another Moslem, an Alhaji. I am greatly pained by the occurrence. In the final conclusion, this appeal fails. It is dismissed. I affirm the judgment of the two courts below.

SYLVESTER U ONU, JSC  – It is clear that for the defence of provocation to avail the appellant, the act or utterance of the deceased must  be  directly  offered  or  directed  against  the appellant, which was not the case here where it was based on hearsay or rumour. There is no direct or indirect evidence to show that the appellant  was provoked  by the deceased  vide Exhibits G and G1 (the latter being the Hausa and the English translation of the appellant’s statement at pages18-20 thereof, as well as the evidence of P.W.5 at page51 of the record) which is enough to convict the appellant as charged. Consequently,  it  is  manifest  that  the  lone  issue before  the  lower  court  is  clear  and  related  to  all  the  defences.

MUHAMMAD, JSC – I cannot see how these kind of people shall have any respite by the law. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Life is precious to all and sundry. He who kills by the sword shall die by the sword. I have no sympathy of the banishment of such busy bodies who respect no human life due to their high degree of misapprehension of the law or, should I say, complete ignorance of the  law.  The appellant  failed  to  convince  me  through  his explanations. But he is free to make further and better explanations to the hang man, though belatedly it may be. I find no merit in this appeal. I dismiss same. I affirm the conviction and sentence of the trial court which were affirmed by the court below.

Held: (Unanimously dismissing the appeal):

That there is no evidence on the record to support the plea of neither justification nor provocation.  Indeed, the appellant did not lead any  evidence in  his own  defence.  The appellant merely acted on a rumour to carry out an illegal act of slaughtering a human being under the misguided belief that he and the others had a duty under Islamic injunction to kill the deceased for illegally insulting Prophet Mohammad  (S.A.W).  The alleged provocative words said to have been uttered by the deceased was never placed before the trial court; and the court will not speculate on that. Appeal dismissed

ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA v. THE STATE (2007) 7-10 S.C. 107

[mks_button size=”medium” title=”Click Here To Read The Full Decision of the Supreme Court” style=”squared” url=”https://www.lawbreed.com/site/search-for-case/?case_ref=895″ target=”_self” bg_color=”#000000″ txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=”” nofollow=”0″]

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Lawbreed Limited
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Related Posts

How to Process a Change of Name at the Supreme Court : Updated Requirements

May 8, 2025

What residents should know and do about Wike’s land policy to protect properties

April 15, 2025

EXPLAINER: What constitution says about emergency rule, governor’s suspension

March 19, 2025

Comments are closed.

www.lawbreed.blog
DARK HEARTS by Layi Babatunde, SAN – CLICK TO BUY
Top Posts

Soyinka At UN: “Slave Trade Has Returned To Africa With One-Sided Ferocity”

March 26, 2025328 Views

Pope Francis dies at 88 – Vatican

April 21, 2025256 Views

Akpoti-Uduaghan charged with criminal defamation over assassination plot claim against Akpabio, Bello

May 23, 2025230 Views

US Supreme Court stops Trump from deporting migrants

April 21, 2025222 Views
QUALITY BOOKS & LAW REPORTS BREEDS QUALITY PRACTICE
https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Law-Breed_x264.mp4
Don't Miss

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

News Update June 14, 2025

A 52-year-old man, Morufudeen Idowu, has been sentenced to three months in prison for assaulting…

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025

Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue

May 29, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram

Subscribe to get Updates

Get the latest creative news delivered to your email. subscribe now

Supreme Court Report Online (My S.C Extra)
Our Picks

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025

Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue

May 29, 2025
Don't Miss

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

News Update June 14, 2025

A 52-year-old man, Morufudeen Idowu, has been sentenced to three months in prison for assaulting…

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025
About Us
About Us

Lawbreed Blog is owned by Lawbreed Limited, a full fledged Law publishing and marketing Private Limited Liability Company, incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Email Us: mails@lawbreed.com
Contact: +2348077011730

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Tags
AMCON APC Atiku Bamise Bandits Bill BOSAN Bribe BRT Buhari BVAS CBN CJN Covid crime EFCC FEA feat FEATU featured FG FIRS Fraud INEC kano Labour Party metro Multichoice NBA New Naira Notes NICN NJC NUC o Old Naira Notes oransaye PEBEC Popular pwc SAN Shar'iah Tax Trending Twitter VAT
Most Popular

Soyinka At UN: “Slave Trade Has Returned To Africa With One-Sided Ferocity”

March 26, 2025328 Views

Pope Francis dies at 88 – Vatican

April 21, 2025256 Views

Akpoti-Uduaghan charged with criminal defamation over assassination plot claim against Akpabio, Bello

May 23, 2025230 Views

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.