Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
  • Home
  • News Update
  • Legal Updates
  • Free Legal Resources
  • Law News
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
  • Home
  • News Update

    Court Sentences Former Chief Pharmacist Of National Hospital, Abuja To Life Imprisonment For Sodomy

    September 20, 2023

    Kano Tribunal Sacks Gov Yusuf, Declares APC’s Gawuna Winner

    September 20, 2023

    Court sentences driver 10 years imprisonment over drug trafficking

    September 15, 2023

    Illegal toll: IGP orders CPs to dismantle all unauthorised checkpoints, arrest violators

    September 15, 2023

    Rivers Governorship: Tribunal reserves judgment in Tonye Cole’s petition

    September 15, 2023
  • Legal Updates

    The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society

    March 13, 2023

    Abia Assembly Passes Bill Allowing Female Children Share in Parent’s Inheritance

    November 25, 2022

    Industrial court issues new Practice Directions on labour matters

    October 6, 2022

    Step By Step Guide on how to register a ship in Nigeria

    September 8, 2022

    Buhari Swears In Ariwoola As Acting Chief Justice Of Nigeria

    June 27, 2022
  • Free Legal Resources

    Download: 12-hour marathon judgement delivered by the Presidential Election Petitions Court

    September 9, 2023

    (Download Judgment) It’s Unconstitutional, Unlawful For Minister To Deduct From Or Tamper With Financial Allocations To States — FHC Rules

    June 27, 2023

    Court Upholds FG’s ‘No Work No Pay’ Policy In Suit Against ASUU

    May 30, 2023

    Download Gazette on Revocation of Operating Licence Of Microfinance Banks Licences By CBN

    May 24, 2023

    DOWNLOAD THE GAZETTED COPYRIGHT ACT 2023

    April 10, 2023
  • Law News

    NBA Endorses ‘Igbaboi’ Igbo Apprenticeship For Lawyers

    September 20, 2023

    CJN Ariwoola Expresses Concern Over Rising Number Of Political Cases In Nigerian Courts

    September 20, 2023

    CJN Swears in New Court of Appeal Justices

    September 20, 2023

    Alleged ‘Undue Influence On Wife’s Judgements’; Court Rejects Bulkachuwa’s Suit To Halt ICPC, DSS Probe Against Him

    September 19, 2023

    Court Awards ₦100 Billion Damages Against NNPC, LNG, And NCDMB For Breach Of Lease Agreement Compensation In Favor Of Finima Community

    September 19, 2023
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Lawbreed BlogLawbreed Blog
Lawbreed Blog » One Of The Worst Sins That A Counsel Can Commit Is To Lie Against The Decision Of A Court — Court Of Appeal Chides Counsel For Relying On Decisions That ‘Damn His Contention
Legal Articles & Commentaries

One Of The Worst Sins That A Counsel Can Commit Is To Lie Against The Decision Of A Court — Court Of Appeal Chides Counsel For Relying On Decisions That ‘Damn His Contention

Lawbreed LimitedBy Lawbreed LimitedJuly 29, 2023No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
court-of-appeal-
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

A Court of Appeal ruling in Jos chastised an appellant’s lawyer for what it termed as an attempt to “mislead” the Courts by relying on conflicting decisions, noting that the decision cited “rather damns his contention.”

In an appeal case before the Court of Appeal, Jos Judicial Division with APPEAL NO CA/J/40C/2018 between, Alhaji Abdullahi Adamu Usman Solid Unit Nigeria Ltd v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, wherein the appellants dissatisfied with the interlocutory ruling of the lower court instituted the appeal.

At the lower court, the appellants were arraigned before the lower Court on a two count charge of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretences and for obtaining the sum of N23.431 Million by false pretences. Sequel to their arraignment, Counsel to the Appellants filed a motion on notice seeking to quash the charge. However, the motion and reply were not heard before the case was resigned to another Lower Court. When the matter came up at the lower court for reassignment, the appellants were absent from Court and similar thing happened at the next adjourned date wherein the Counsel for the appellant provided a medical report claiming the 1st appellant to be seek and sought leave of court to be allowed to move the motion seeking to quash the charge in the absence of the Appellants. The lower court refused the leave, and went on to order that the appellants be present at the next adjourned date.

The Appellants were dissatisfied with this directive of the lower Court and they caused their Counsel to file a notice of appeal. At the hearing of the appeal, the Court asked Counsel to the Appellants if he obtained the leave of either the lower Court or this Court before filing the appeal and Counsel replied in the negative. The Court further inquired from Counsel to the Appellants if he did not think that he required leave to file the appeal and Counsel again replied in the negative saying that the grounds of appeal were grounds of law alone.

Addressing this, the Court per Habeeb Adewale OLumuyira Abiru, JCA held that is trite that an appeal may be on ground of facts alone or on ground of law alone or on ground of mixed law and facts. By the provisions of section 241 (1) (a) and (b) of the 1999 Constitution a party can appeal to the Court of Appeal as of right only where the decision appealed against is a final decision or where the grounds of appeal involves question of law alone. In any other situation, section 242 of the Constitution says that the party must only appeal with leave of either the High Court or the Court of Appeal. The ordinary meaning of these provisions is that where an appeal is from an interlocutory decision of the High Court and the ground of appeal is not on law alone, a party must obtain the leave of either the High Court or of the Court of Appeal for the appeal to be competent.

The notice of appeal was brought on three grounds. However, the Court of Appeal held only the first two grounds as viable appeal. As such, the third issue hinged on the 3rd ground of appeal was dismissed by the Court.
The other two issues for determination read thus:

1. Whether the learned trial Judge is right in law when he refused to hear the Appellants’ application dated the 19th of August, 2016 to quash the charges against the accused persons which application is challenging the jurisdiction of the court owing to the circumstances of this case.

2. Whether the refusal of the learned trial Judge to follow the Court of appeal decisions in Alintah Vs FRN (2008) All FWLR (Pt 436) 2009 and Ezeze Vs The State (2005) All FWLR (Pt 255) 1195 does not negate the principle of judicial precedent and occasioned a miscarriage of justice on the Appellants.

In arguing the first issue, the Appellants counsel stated that the trial Court was in error when it failed to determine the issue of jurisdiction raised in the motion dated the 19th of August, 2016 and that its holding that the accused person be brought in whatever manner before the Court could determine whether or not to dispense with his presence is an abruption of the law which occasioned a miscarriage of justice. On issue two, he again referred to and quoted from the decisions of this Court in Alintah Vs FRN (2008) All FWLR (Pt 436) 2009 and Ezeze Vs The State (2005) All FWLR (Pt 255) 1195 and he stated that the lower Court did not determine the question whether the presence of an accused person can be dispensed with because there is an application before the Court challenging the jurisdiction of the court and seeking to quash the charge. On their part, the respondent counsel stated that the reliance placed by Counsel to the Appellants in this appeal on the decision of this Court in Alintah Vs FRN supra was completely misplaced. On the Appellants’ second issue for determination, Counsel stated that it is settled law that a case is only authority for what it decided and nothing more.

Ruling on the appeal, Habeeb Adewale OLumuyira Abiru, JCA ruled thus:” This Court must say from the onset that this appeal is one of the most misguided appeals, and perhaps one of the most irresponsible use and abuse of the appellate Court process, that this Court has seen in a long while. Counsel to the Appellants predicated the appeal on a conjured up, non-existent, scenario, manipulated and misrepresented decided decisions of this Court to support the non-existent scenario and then presented same to this Court to resolve.”

According to the Court, the lower Court did not refuse to hear the application to quash the charge without the necessity of the presence of the Appellant, but rather demanded and rightly so, for an explanation for absence of the Appellants from Court on the date fixed for definite arraignment and when it saw that explanation offered by the medical report presented was inadequate.

In addition it was the holding of the Court that: “One of the most elementary and rudimentary of the principles of judicial precedent is that it recognizes that decisions of court draw their inspiration and strength from the facts which framed the issues for decision and once such decisions are made they control future judgment in like or similar cases, hence the facts of two cases must either be the same or at least similar before a decision in the earlier case can be used in a later case”

The Court also reiterated the working of judicial precedents thus: “The doctrine of judicial precedent postulates that what is binding on a lower court in the decision of a higher court is the principle or principles decided and not the rules and that if the facts and circumstances which framed the principle decided are similar to or same with the facts and circumstances of the case before the lower court, the lower court has no choice but to follow the principle decided. Where, however, the facts and circumstances in both cases are not similar or the same, the inferior court is not bound by the principle decided in the case before the higher court ”

Furthermore, His Lordship ruled that Counsel for the Appellants completely misrepresented the decision of the Court in the of Alintah Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria and he quoted portions of it out of context.
“The question is – how does the decision of this Court in Alintah Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria supra support the contention of Counsel to Appellants? The decision rather damns his contention. One of the worst sins that a Counsel can commit is to manipulate, to misrepresent and to lie against the decision of a Court. It is unethical conduct and a condemnable act” the Court held.

His Lordship further reiterated that it was the duty of a lawyer to pursue justice and not mislead the Court. “Counsel to the Appellants twisted the facts of case and misrepresented decided case law authorities to suit his purpose and completely abdicated his responsibility to the cause of truth and justice in his conduct of this appeal. This Court will hesitate in reporting the Counsel to the appropriate disciplinary organ of his professional body at this time. It is hoped that Counsel will adjust his actions to accord with the expected ethics of the Bar.” His Lordship ruled.

The Court in conclusion ruled thus: “the appeal is downright frivolous, vexatious and totally lacking in merit. The appeal is hereby dismissed. The decision contained in the Ruling of the High Court of Plateau State delivered in Suit No PLD/J103C/2016 by Honorable Justice D. D. Longi on the 16th of January, 2018 is affirmed.”

Gyang Zi with Y. L. Ayuba, H. A. Dongo & N. I. Williams for the Appellants. Benjamin Manji, Legal Officer with EFCC for the Respondent.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Related

featured
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Lawbreed Limited
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Related Posts

NBA Endorses ‘Igbaboi’ Igbo Apprenticeship For Lawyers

September 20, 2023

Nigeria’s Tax Treaties And Foreign Tax Credit Claims Computation -By Dr Kennedy Iwundu

September 20, 2023

Court Sentences Former Chief Pharmacist Of National Hospital, Abuja To Life Imprisonment For Sodomy

September 20, 2023

Comments are closed.

Like Our Page
Lawbreed Limited
DARK HEARTS by Layi Babatunde, SAN – CLICK TO BUY
DARK HEART BY LAYI BABATUNDE, SAN
Top Posts

Finance Act, 2019 – Discover The Plus And Minus Of It – Click To Download

March 4, 2020

Holding Property Jointly – By Layi Babatunde, Esq

March 4, 2020

Is Your Deed Truly Delivered? – By Layi Babatunde, Esq.

March 4, 2020

It Is Unprofessional Conduct For Counsel To Walk Out On Or From The Court

March 4, 2020
QUALITY BOOKS & LAW REPORTS BREEDS QUALITY PRACTICE
https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Law-Breed_x264.mp4
Don't Miss
Law News

NBA Endorses ‘Igbaboi’ Igbo Apprenticeship For Lawyers

By Lawbreed LimitedSeptember 20, 2023

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has endorsed the Igbo apprenticeship system known as ‘Igbaboi’ as…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Nigeria’s Tax Treaties And Foreign Tax Credit Claims Computation -By Dr Kennedy Iwundu

September 20, 2023

Court Sentences Former Chief Pharmacist Of National Hospital, Abuja To Life Imprisonment For Sodomy

September 20, 2023

CJN Ariwoola Expresses Concern Over Rising Number Of Political Cases In Nigerian Courts

September 20, 2023

CJN Swears in New Court of Appeal Justices

September 20, 2023
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Subscribe to get Updates

Get the latest creative news delivered to your email. subscribe now

Supreme Court Report Online (My S.C Extra)
s.c online
About Us
About Us

Lawbreed Blog is owned by Lawbreed Limited, a full fledged Law publishing and marketing Private Limited Liability Company, incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Email Us: mails@lawbreed.com
Contact: +2348077011730

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Tags
#2023Election Adeleke AMCON APC Atiku Bandits Bill BOSAN Buhari BVAS CBN CJN Covid crime feat feature featured FIRS Fraud ICPC INEC Judgements of the Supreme Court of Nigeria kano Labour Party metro Multichoice NBA New Naira Notes NICArb NICN NJC NPC NUC o Obi oransaye Osun State Owo massacre practice directions SAN Shar'iah Tax Tinubu Twitter VAT
Most Popular

Finance Act, 2019 – Discover The Plus And Minus Of It – Click To Download

March 4, 2020

Holding Property Jointly – By Layi Babatunde, Esq

March 4, 2020

Is Your Deed Truly Delivered? – By Layi Babatunde, Esq.

March 4, 2020
© 2023 Lawbreed.blog. Powered by Lawbreed Ltd.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • S.C Report Online
  • Our Publications
  • Lawyers Directory

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.