Close Menu
  • Home
  • News Update
  • Legal Updates
  • Free Legal Resources
  • Law News
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions

Subscribe to receive Updates

Get the latest updates from us

What's Hot

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

June 14, 2025

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Lawbreed Blog
Visit our Website
  • Home
  • News Update

    Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

    June 14, 2025

    ‘Omo-onile’ now in trouble, risk 21yrs imprisonment in Ondo —Aiyedatiwa goes tough on land issues

    May 29, 2025

    ICPC secures conviction of Lagos civil servant for receiving double salaries

    May 29, 2025

    Naira abuse: Kano Tiktoker, Murja, sentenced to 6 months in jail

    May 29, 2025

    FCT High Court Slams EFCC For Breach of Applicant’s Fundamental Rights, Awards N2m Costs

    May 26, 2025
  • Legal Updates

    How to Process a Change of Name at the Supreme Court : Updated Requirements

    May 8, 2025

    What residents should know and do about Wike’s land policy to protect properties

    April 15, 2025

    EXPLAINER: What constitution says about emergency rule, governor’s suspension

    March 19, 2025

    The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society

    March 13, 2023

    Abia Assembly Passes Bill Allowing Female Children Share in Parent’s Inheritance

    November 25, 2022
  • Free Legal Resources

    US court orders FBI, DEA to release records on Tinubu’s investigation (See UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION)

    April 14, 2025

    Relief for Tinubu as U.S. judge denies Greenspan’s motion to fast-track confidential records disclosure by FBI, CIA, others

    October 24, 2023

    Nigeria wins $11bn P&ID case in UK court (Download Judgment)

    October 23, 2023

    Download: 12-hour marathon judgement delivered by the Presidential Election Petitions Court

    September 9, 2023

    (Download Judgment) It’s Unconstitutional, Unlawful For Minister To Deduct From Or Tamper With Financial Allocations To States — FHC Rules

    June 27, 2023
  • Law News

    Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

    June 14, 2025

    Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

    June 7, 2025

    Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

    June 7, 2025

    Lawyers sue senators to refund salaries over poor performance

    May 29, 2025

    Kogi CJ signs new area Court rules

    May 26, 2025
  • More
    • Legal Articles & Commentaries
    • Recent Events
    • Promotions
    • About Us
    • S.C Report Online
    • S.C Report Printed Editions
Lawbreed Blog
Home»Legal Articles & Commentaries»MultiChoice Nigeria, Tax Tribunal Ruling: Issues and Doubts by Prof. M.T. Abdulrazaq
Legal Articles & Commentaries

MultiChoice Nigeria, Tax Tribunal Ruling: Issues and Doubts by Prof. M.T. Abdulrazaq

Lawbreed LimitedBy Lawbreed LimitedOctober 12, 2021Updated:March 2, 2022No Comments8 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
FIRS and multichoice
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Prof. M.T. Abdulrazaq

The Multichoice (Nigeria) Ltd case before the Tax Appeal Tribunal confirms that we are in interesting tax times. The Tax Appeal Tribunal in the Lagos Zone held at Lagos recent ruling raises fundamental doubts and issues of taxation in Suit No: TAT/LZ/CIT/062/2021 dated the 24th day of August 2021.

In the quest to resolve the issues and doubts three fundamental and basic tax issues as stated by the following judicial decisions needs to be restated and noted. What are they? First, in Karam v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1946-1949) 12 WACA 331 at 333, 336 it was held that “Statutes which impose pecuniary burdens on subjects are interpreted strictly “See also Alhaji Ibrahim Ahmadu & Anors V Governor of Kogi State (2002)2 NWLR (PT 755) Pg 502 at 522 and Federal Board of Inland Revenue v. Nigeria General Insurance Company Ltd (1966) LLR 88 at 95. In 7UP Bottling Company PLC v, Lagos State Internal Revenue Board (2000) 3 NWLR (Pt 650) 565 at 591 paras H-A, Nzeako JCA held that “It has often been the view of courts here and elsewhere that if a person sought to be taxed, comes within the letter of the law, then such a person must be taxed, on the other hand, if the tax authority is seeking to recover tax from a person is unable to bring him within the letter of the law, the person will be free. However apparently, within the spirit of the law, his case ought to otherwise appear to be.”

Secondly, in the case of Okupe v. Federal Board of Inland Revenue (1992) 1 NTC 321 at 330. It was held that while the Federal Board of Inland Revenue is entrusted with the duty to operate the tax law of the country, in doing so the legislature provides safeguards for the liberty of the taxpayer and in particular safeguards from arbitrary and capricious assessments which are not made bona fide or which are perverse.

Thirdly, in Azikwe v. FEDECO (1981) 1 PLR at 561 the court held that the tax affairs of everyone is a very secret and confidential matter between the tax authorities and the tax payer. No one is entitled to be informed what his neighbour pays by way of tax. This judgment is supported by the provisions of Section 50 of the Federal Inland Revenue Service Establishment) Act of 2007 on official secrecy and confidentiality in tax matters.

What do all these mean? They simply mean in the words of the Court in the English case of Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1921) 12 Tax Cases 358 that “In a taxing act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There is no presumption as to a tax. Nothing is to be read in, nothing is to be implied. One can only look fairly at the language used.”

Prof ABDULRAZAQ
Prof. M.T. Abdulrazaq

In other words, the Nigerian tax process must be done in accordance with the strict provisions of the Nigerian tax laws and statutory provisions. What therefore was the ruling of Tax Appeal Tribunal about? The facts are fairly straightforward. Multichoice Nigeria Limited filed an appeal against the Companies Income Tax and Value Added Tax assessment notice of the Federal Inland Revenue Service on several grounds. MultiChoice Nigeria objected to the FIRS assessment, which it alleged was based on an alleged deemed turnover figure. MultiChioce Nigeria made it clear that they provided an audited financial statement prepared by a well-known reputable global firm, which they stated was duly attached to their annual tax return filed at the FIRS. They also complained about the FIRS press release of July 8, 2021 and a post no debit directive to banks and lastly about the breach of the statutory limit of six years for tax audits and investigations as stated in section 66 of the Companies Income Tax Act.

The FIRS response to the above grounds were that they had the power under Section 65 of CITA to issue a best of judgment assessment on any taxpayer, including MultiChoice Nigeria. They alleged that they were denied access to the database of MultiChoice Nigeria. They further alleged that the financial statement of the parent company in South Africa, which is publicly available showed that about 34% of the group revenue came from Nigeria but that this was not reflected in the tax payment of MultiChoice Nigeria. The FIRS also alleged that MultiChoice Nigeria was owing One Trillion, Eight Hundred and Twenty-Two Billion, Nine Hundred and Twenty Tree Million, Nine Hundred and Ninety-Nine Thousand, Three Hundred and Thirteen Naira, Ninety-Four Kobo (N1,822,923,909,313.94).

In furtherance of this at the Tax Appeal Tribunal, the FIRS brought a motion on notice pursuant to paragraph 15(7) (b) and (c) of the 5th schedule to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment ) Act No. 13 of 2007; Section 91(b) of the Evidence Act 2011; Section 44(2)(k) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and under the inherent jurisdiction of the Tax Appeal Tribunal for an order of accelerated hearing of the appeal, an order to produce integrated annual report and the management account statements of Multichoice Group Limited (its parent company) for the tax years 2012 – 2020 revenue chart showing the business of Multichoice Group Limited and inventory of the subscribers database of Nigerian subscribers who constitute 34% of its business revenue in Nigeria and more importantly to direct Multichoice Nigeria to deposit as security for prosecution, the sum of Ninety One Billion, One Hundred and Forty Six Million, One Hundred and Ninety Five Thousand, Four Hundred and Sixty Five Naira, Sixty Nine Kobo (N91,146,195,465.69).

The TAT in its ruling granted the order that MultiChoice Nigeria deposit with the FIRS before the date of the adjourned hearing an amount on account of the tax charged by the assessment under appeal, equal to the tax charged upon the appellant for the preceding year of assessment or one half of the tax charged by the assessment under appeal, which is the lesser plus a sum equal to ten percent of the said deposit and if the appellant fails to comply with the order, the assessment against which MultiChoice Nigeria appealed shall be confirmed and the appellant shall have no further right of appeal with respect to that assessment.

It must be stated that this ruling has very wide legal implications. There are also serious issues of the constitutionality of the decision with regards to fair hearing and burden of proof in the application of paragraph 15 (7) of the FIRS (Establishment) Act towards the person who will be affected by the decision. See GCHQ (1985) AC 374. To ask a party in a tax dispute to pay such a humongous amount as security to enable a further hearing is a failure by an administrative tribunal to observe procedural rules that are expressly laid down in the legislative instrument by which its jurisdiction is conferred and a miscarriage of justice from denial of fair hearing. See FBIR v. Halliburton (WA) Limited (2015) 17 TLRN and Access Bank Plc v. Edo State Board of Internal Revenue 2018 LPECR – 44156(CA). See also Igbinedion v. Edo State Board of Internal Revenue (2017) 161265 LRCN 69 at 85-86. The decision on fair hearing in the Access Bank case is instructive to the effect that where there is a breach of fair hearing, the decision cannot stand having been made in violation of the provisions of section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The application of paragraph 15(7) as a basis for the TAT ruling raises serious doubts as it did not include a consideration of 15(7) (a) whether MCN has for the year of assessment concerned, failed to prepare and deliver to the FIRS returns required to be furnished under the relevant provisions of the tax laws.

Was it proven that MCN did not deliver to the FIRS returns required to be furnished under the law? Did MCN not file their tax returns for the year of assessment? Were the conclusions based on facts? On whom is the burden of proof in the application of 15(7)? MCN had alleged a violation of compliance with the laid down procedure under the Companies Income Tax Act and Part V of the FIRS (Establishment) Act before the notice of assessment was issued by the FIRS. It is apparent that onus of proof was on the FIRS, which applied for the accelerated hearing and not MCN, which complained that the FIRS had failed to carry out the steps for assessment as provided for under the law and held in the case of Federal Board of Inland Revenue v. Ibadan Bus Services (1992) 1 Nigerian Tax Cases 165 at 166.

There is no doubt that the coming days would be interesting times as we await the application of the mechanism of justice and fair hearing in Nigerian taxation.

Abdulrazaq, a professor of Taxation, Faculty of Law, Lagos State University, writes from Lagos

FIRS Multichoice Tax
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Lawbreed Limited
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Related Posts

Conflicting Decisions of Courts in Nigeria: Impact on Justice Delivery and Political Stability—Chief J.S. Okutepa, SAN.

May 23, 2025

The Lawyer’s Guide To Authenticating Electronic Evidence In Nigeria

May 13, 2025

“Supreme Court Ruling On Rivers Lawmakers Wrong” — Prof. Sagay SAN Criticizes Judgment That Allowed Defectors To Keep Seats

May 12, 2025

Comments are closed.

www.lawbreed.blog
DARK HEARTS by Layi Babatunde, SAN – CLICK TO BUY
Top Posts

Soyinka At UN: “Slave Trade Has Returned To Africa With One-Sided Ferocity”

March 26, 2025328 Views

Pope Francis dies at 88 – Vatican

April 21, 2025256 Views

Akpoti-Uduaghan charged with criminal defamation over assassination plot claim against Akpabio, Bello

May 23, 2025230 Views

US Supreme Court stops Trump from deporting migrants

April 21, 2025222 Views
QUALITY BOOKS & LAW REPORTS BREEDS QUALITY PRACTICE
https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Law-Breed_x264.mp4
Don't Miss

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

News Update June 14, 2025

A 52-year-old man, Morufudeen Idowu, has been sentenced to three months in prison for assaulting…

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025

Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue

May 29, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram

Subscribe to get Updates

Get the latest creative news delivered to your email. subscribe now

Supreme Court Report Online (My S.C Extra)
Our Picks

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025

Elon Musk leaves White House but says Doge will continue

May 29, 2025
Don't Miss

Lagos court jails man for assaulting govt worker

News Update June 14, 2025

A 52-year-old man, Morufudeen Idowu, has been sentenced to three months in prison for assaulting…

Lagos High Court to Begin Annual Vacation July 21, Criminal Cases to Proceed

June 14, 2025

Lawyers escape contempt proceedings over fake citation cases – but set to face regulators

June 7, 2025

Lagos court remands a 75-year-old man and four others to Kirikiri jail for illegal waste disposal

June 7, 2025
About Us
About Us

Lawbreed Blog is owned by Lawbreed Limited, a full fledged Law publishing and marketing Private Limited Liability Company, incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Email Us: mails@lawbreed.com
Contact: +2348077011730

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Tags
AMCON APC Atiku Bamise Bandits Bill BOSAN Bribe BRT Buhari BVAS CBN CJN Covid crime EFCC FEA feat FEATU featured FG FIRS Fraud INEC kano Labour Party metro Multichoice NBA New Naira Notes NICN NJC NUC o Old Naira Notes oransaye PEBEC Popular pwc SAN Shar'iah Tax Trending Twitter VAT
Most Popular

Soyinka At UN: “Slave Trade Has Returned To Africa With One-Sided Ferocity”

March 26, 2025328 Views

Pope Francis dies at 88 – Vatican

April 21, 2025256 Views

Akpoti-Uduaghan charged with criminal defamation over assassination plot claim against Akpabio, Bello

May 23, 2025230 Views

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.