Subscribe to receive Updates
Get the latest updates from us
Author: Lawbreed Limited
Publishers of Judgments of The Supreme Court of Nigeria (S.C Report) - on the Authority of the Supreme Court of Nigeria
In exercise of the powers conferred on him by Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Quarantine Act (CAP Q2 LFN 2004), and all other powers enabling him in that behalf, President Muhammadu Buhari, Monday, signed the Covid-19 Regulations, 2020, which declared Covid-19 a dangerous infectious disease. The Regulations, effective March 30, 2020, also gave legal backing to the various measures outlined in the President’s National Broadcast on March 29, 2020, such as Restriction/Cessation of Movement in Lagos, FCT and Ogun State and others toward containing the spread of the pandemic in the country. In addition, to ensure that Nigerians…
PARTIES: MR. ADEBAYO MUMINI SHITTU & ANOR V. KNIGH ROOK LIMITED & 2 ORS DATE OF RULING: 24th OCTOBER, 2019 COURT: HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE SUIT: LD/8418LMW/2019 CORAM: K. A. JOSE (MRS.) ISSUE(S): Power of court to grant Orders of Injunction against AMCON inspite of S. 34(6) of the AMCON Act (as amended ) in 2019 [mks_button size=”medium” title=”Click Here To Download Ruling” style=”rounded” url=”https://lawbreed.blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/RULING-IN-SHITTU-V.-KNIGHT-ROOK.pdf.pdf” target=”_blank” bg_color=”#046012″ txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=”” nofollow=”0″]
The Governor of Lagos State, Babajide Olusola Sanwa-Olu, has made Infectious Diseases Regulations to curtail the spread of COVID-19. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a new virus with no vaccine currently. Nigeria currently has over 80 persons who are positive of the virus with 3 discharged and 1 dead. Lawyers have been debating on the legality or otherwise of the many orders have been given by the President and Governors of various states restricting movements and gatherings of people. Meanwhile, the Lagos State government made the Infectious Disease Regulations pursuant to the Public Health Law Of…
CASE CITATION: ILIYA AKWAI LAGGA v. AUDU YUSUF SARHUNA (2008) 6-7 S.C. (Pt. I) 101 DATE OF JUDGMENT: FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2008 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 133/2002 CORAM: NIKI TOBI (Presided) OGUNTADE IKECHI F. OGBUAGU FRANCIS F. TABAI IBRAHIM T. MUHAMMAD (Delivered the Leading Judgment) ISSUE(S): WHAT CONSTITUTES A VAGUE GROUND OF APPEAL? CASE SYNTHESIS A vague ground of appeal is that which is imprecise, not cogent, not concise. It is inaccurate, verbose, large, rigmarole, vague, which is capable of making the appeal court or the respondent to the appeal not to understand what it exactly connotes. Although Order…
CASE CITATION: R-BENKAY NIGERIA LIMITED v. CADBURY NIGERIA PLC. (2012) 3 S.C. (Pt. III) 169 DATE OF JUDGMENT: FRIDAY 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2012 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 29/2006 CORAM: IBRAHIM T. MUHAMMAD (Presided) OLUFUNLOLA O. ADEKEYE (Delivered the Leading Judgment) BODE RHODES-VIVOUR NWALI S. NGWUTA MARY U. PETER-ODILI ISSUE(S): WHEN IS THE PROCESS ABUSED? CASE SYNTHESIS “The concept of abuse of court process relying on numerous decided authorities is imprecise. It involves circumstances and situation of infinite variety and conditions. But a common feature of it is the improper use of judicial process by a party in litigation…
CASE CITATION: MADAM ADUNOLA ADEJUMO & 2 ORS. v. MR. OLUDAYO OLAWAIYE (2014) 5-6 S.C. (Pt. II) 122 DATE OF JUDGMENT: FRIDAY 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2014 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 38/2004 CORAM: WALTER S. N. ONNOGHEN(Presided) SULAIMAN GALADIMA BODE RHODES-VIVOUR (Delivered the Leading Judgment) KUMAI B. AKA’AHS JOHN I. OKORO ISSUE(S): NOTICE OF APPEAL – WHAT GROUNDS OF APPEAL SHOULD CONTAIN CASE SYNTHESIS An appeal is filed by the party who lost the case. He signifies his intention to appeal by filing a notice of appeal. A notice of appeal contains grounds of appeal. Issues for determination of the appeal…
CASE CITATION: HON. POLYCARP EFFIOM & 3 ORS. v. CROSS RIVER STATE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION (CROSIEC) & ANOR. (2010) 4-7 S.C. (Pt. I) 32 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2010 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 289/2008 CORAM: DAHIRU MUSDAPHER (Presided) WALTER S. N. ONNOGHEN FRANCIS F. TABAI (Delivered the Leading Judgment) JOHN A. FABIYI OLUFUNLOLA O. ADEKEYE ISSUE(S): COURT RAISING AN ISSUE SUO MOTU AND DECIDING IT, WITHOUT AFFORDING PARTIES A HEARING – WHEN MAY BE VALID CASE SYNTHESIS “On the Issue of whether it was proper for the Court below to raise the Issue of locus…
CASE CITATION: ENL CONSORTIUM v. SHAMBILAT SHELTER (NIG.) LTD.(2018) 1 S.C. (Pt. IV) 62 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 40/2015 CORAM: MARY UKAEGO PETER-ODILI (Presided & Delivered the Leading Judgment) KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS AMINA ADAMU AUGIE PAUL ADAMU GALUMJE SIDI DAUDA BAGE ISSUE(S): SERVICE VIA PHONE CALL – WHETHER GOOD SERVICE CASE SYNTHESIS “The point has to be made that the phone call mode of service would ordinarily be of good service so long as the party is provided the notice at least 48hours before the scheduled court date. The regularity…
By the progression of Land holding in Nigeria, from “Communal Land”, and/or “Family Land” to individual land ownership, it became imperative, ‘ because of obvious competing interests and the magnitude of it, that a land owner, should possess some documentary or other easily ascertainable evidence of ownership or title. Over the years, such evidence has been inter alia, purchase receipt, Registered Conveyance, Land Certificate and Certificate of Occupancy. Let us start by examining the Certificate of Occupancy. The Certificate of Occupancy as the name implies, merely confers possessory rights on the holder. What therefore is enjoyed, is right to occupy…
CASE CITATION: SAVANNAH BANK OF NIGERIA PLC. v. OLADIPO OPANUBI (2004) 7 S.C. (PT. II) 1 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2004 COURT: SUPREME COURT SUIT: SC. 154/2000 CORAM: IDRIS L. KUTIGI, JSC – (Presided) SYLVESTER U. ONU, JSC SAMSON O. UWAIFO, JSC – (Delivered the Leading Judgment) NIKI TOBI, JSC DENNIS O. EDOZIE, JSC ISSUE(S): WHEN NOT TO DEBRIEF A LAWYER CASE SYNTHESIS “All the reason the appellant gave in that letter for terminating the brief was that: “Bearing in mind the strained relationship of client and solicitor, we have no other alternative than to withdraw…