The National Judicial Council (NJC) has vehemently rejected the Benue State House of Assembly’s attempt to remove Chief Judge Hon. Justice Maurice Ikpambese, labeling it unconstitutional and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. This stance is firmly backed by the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), which had earlier condemned the move as a brazen attack on the Constitution and judicial independence.
The NJC reaffirmed its exclusive constitutional authority to recommend the removal of judicial officers. Despite receiving a petition against Justice Ikpambese, the NJC emphasized that no investigation has been conducted, nor has any recommendation been made for his removal. The Council categorically stated that Justice Ikpambese remains the Chief Judge of Benue State until the complaint is investigated and deliberated upon.
The NBA had also issued a statement on February 8, 2025, criticizing the Benue State House of Assembly’s actions as unconstitutional and lacking in understanding of the Constitution. The NBA pointed to Sections 153, 271, and 292 of the 1999 Constitution, which clearly outline the removal process for a Chief Judge.
Both the NJC and the NBA have called for the protection of Justice Ikpambese and the upholding of judicial independence. The NBA has warned judges against accepting any appointment as Acting Chief Judge under these circumstances and directed lawyers in Benue State to boycott the court of any judge who accepts such an appointment.
The NJC’s stance reaffirms the legal community’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting judicial independence against political interference. The NBA remains committed to ensuring that no arm of government acts outside the law and calls on the Benue State House of Assembly to rescind its decision and follow due process.
