The Attorney-General of Jigawa state and Commissioner of Justice, Dr. Musa Adamu Aliyu, has dragged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), its President, Mr Olumide Akpata and five others before a High Court of Justice in the state.
In the suit dated November 9, 2021, the plaintiff, through his Counsel, Abdur rahman Mukhtar Abdullahi is praying the court to set aside report of fact finding committee of the NBA and stop the implementation of the report against the plaintiff.
In the report, the NBA fact finding committee was said to have found the commissioner of justice guilty of abuse of office, after a petition was written against him by two staff of the Jigawa State Ministry of Justice, Nuhu Suleiman Tafida, and Adamu Mukhtar.
The plaintiff averred that the NBA fact finding committee lacked the legal backing to investigate him or assume the disciplinary powers of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee.
Other defendants in the suit are John Aikpokpo-Martins Esq., Godwin Omoka, SAN, Ahmed Uwais Esq., Mustapha Imam Esq and Abdulrahman Bello El-Ibrani Esq
The plaintiff in the suit want the court to determine the following questions:
Whether in the Light of Rules 2 and 4 of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee Rules 2020, the 1st Defendant’s Fact-Finding Committee chaired by the 3rd Defendant and has the 4th-7th Defendants as members, has the same powers with the Legal Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee to entertain and determine a Complaint submitted to it against the Claimant to the extent of finding him to have ”conducted himself in a manner unbecoming of a legal practitioner in the course of his undue interference in the affairs of Dutse”
“Whether the Defendants have power to direct, interfere and meddle with the constitutional functions and powers of the Claimant enshrined under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,1999 (as amended) in his capacity as the incumbent Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice of Jigawa State, under the guise of a mandate given to a Fact-Finding Committee set up by the 3rd defendant?
“Whether having regard to Ss. 5, 128, 129, 193 and 194 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the 1st Defendant’s Fact-Finding Committee chaired by the 3rd Defendant assisted by the 4th – 7th Defendants as members thereof is vested with powers to make a resolution(s) directing the Claimant as the Attorney General of Jigawa State to reverse and/or review a decision made within the Ministry of Justice of Jigawa State?
Dr Aliyu, maintained that the, ”The act complained of and sought to be reviewed/reversed was done by the Claimant in his capacity as a commissioner duly appointed by the Governor of Jigawa State and is subject to the relevant civil service rules applicable to civil servants in the service of Jigawa State;
”Allegation(s) of abuse of office against a public servant can only be entertained and determined by the Code of Conduct Tribunal in line with Paragraphs 9 ,12 and 18(1) to the Fifth Schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended);
”Allegations of suspension and removal from office of an employee can only be entertained by the National Industrial Court of Nigeria.”
Other reliefs sought in the suit are: A declaration that the 1st Defendant’s action of directing the Claimant to review/reversed an act done by him in his capacity as a commissioner duly appointed by the Governor of Jigawa State is ultra vires, illegal, null and void and of no effect whatsoever as same contravenes the provisions of the 1999 Constitution particularly S. 254C thereof.
A declaration that the act of the Defendants of investigating a complaint of abuse of office against the Claimant in respect of matters done in exercise of the executive powers conferred on him by virtue of his position as the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice is null and void and done in contravention of the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) particularly Ss. 5, 128, 129, 193 and 194 thereof.
”The Defendants particularly the 1st ,2nd and 3rd Defendants are taking serious steps to implement the recommendations contained in the NBA Fact Finding Committee.”
